Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Demurrage paid separately by the buyer and seller for vessel waiting time, outside letter-of-credit payment for imported goods, is not part of the price actually paid or payable and is not includible in transaction value. A differential customs-duty demand cannot rely on a valuation provision absent from the show cause notice; reliance on such a ground exceeds the notice. Extended limitation requires evidence of a positive act of wilful suppression intended to evade duty, and oral allegations alone are insufficient. On these grounds, the differential-duty demand based on demurrage was unsustainable, and the notice for the specified Bills of Entry was time-barred.
Demurrage paid separately by the buyer and seller for vessel waiting time, outside letter-of-credit payment for imported goods, is not part of the price actually paid or payable and is not includible in transaction value. A differential customs-duty demand cannot rely on a valuation provision absent from the show cause notice; reliance on such a ground exceeds the notice. Extended limitation requires evidence of a positive act of wilful suppression intended to evade duty, and oral allegations alone are insufficient. On these grounds, the differential-duty demand based on demurrage was unsustainable, and the notice for the specified Bills of Entry was time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.