Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out basis.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through the debtor's admissions, the running account, payment appropriation, and supporting evidence. The note states that where payments are not directed toward specific invoices, the operational creditor may appropriate them on a first-in-first-out basis. It further discusses that inconsistent positions on payment appropriation may engage the principle against approbating and reprobating, and that unsupported assertions of short supply, debit notes, deficiencies, or protected-period claims may not establish a genuine dispute. It also addresses the permissibility of placing additional documents, including communications and financier-related material, on record before a final insolvency order is passed.
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through the debtor's admissions, the running account, payment appropriation, and supporting evidence. The note states that where payments are not directed toward specific invoices, the operational creditor may appropriate them on a first-in-first-out basis. It further discusses that inconsistent positions on payment appropriation may engage the principle against approbating and reprobating, and that unsupported assertions of short supply, debit notes, deficiencies, or protected-period claims may not establish a genuine dispute. It also addresses the permissibility of placing additional documents, including communications and financier-related material, on record before a final insolvency order is passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.