Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out basis.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through the debtor's admissions, the running account, payment appropriation, and supporting evidence. The note states that where payments are not directed toward specific invoices, the operational creditor may appropriate them on a first-in-first-out basis. It further discusses that inconsistent positions on payment appropriation may engage the principle against approbating and reprobating, and that unsupported assertions of short supply, debit notes, deficiencies, or protected-period claims may not establish a genuine dispute. It also addresses the permissibility of placing additional documents, including communications and financier-related material, on record before a final insolvency order is passed.
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through the debtor's admissions, the running account, payment appropriation, and supporting evidence. The note states that where payments are not directed toward specific invoices, the operational creditor may appropriate them on a first-in-first-out basis. It further discusses that inconsistent positions on payment appropriation may engage the principle against approbating and reprobating, and that unsupported assertions of short supply, debit notes, deficiencies, or protected-period claims may not establish a genuine dispute. It also addresses the permissibility of placing additional documents, including communications and financier-related material, on record before a final insolvency order is passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.