Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out basis.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through the debtor's admissions, the running account, payment appropriation, and supporting evidence. The note states that where payments are not directed toward specific invoices, the operational creditor may appropriate them on a first-in-first-out basis. It further discusses that inconsistent positions on payment appropriation may engage the principle against approbating and reprobating, and that unsupported assertions of short supply, debit notes, deficiencies, or protected-period claims may not establish a genuine dispute. It also addresses the permissibility of placing additional documents, including communications and financier-related material, on record before a final insolvency order is passed.
Pre-existing disputes in operational debt are examined through the debtor's admissions, the running account, payment appropriation, and supporting evidence. The note states that where payments are not directed toward specific invoices, the operational creditor may appropriate them on a first-in-first-out basis. It further discusses that inconsistent positions on payment appropriation may engage the principle against approbating and reprobating, and that unsupported assertions of short supply, debit notes, deficiencies, or protected-period claims may not establish a genuine dispute. It also addresses the permissibility of placing additional documents, including communications and financier-related material, on record before a final insolvency order is passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.