Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 exclusions do not extend to cases involving confiscation or redemption fine. Redemption fine imposed in lieu of confiscation forms part of the amount recoverable under the applicable indirect tax law and cannot be separated from the duty demand for Scheme eligibility. A departmental communication treating redemption fine as excluded was inconsistent with the statutory Scheme. Accordingly, inclusion of redemption fine in an SVLDR-1 declaration does not by itself make the declarant ineligible; a rejected declaration must be treated as eligible and considered on merits in accordance with law.
The Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 exclusions do not extend to cases involving confiscation or redemption fine. Redemption fine imposed in lieu of confiscation forms part of the amount recoverable under the applicable indirect tax law and cannot be separated from the duty demand for Scheme eligibility. A departmental communication treating redemption fine as excluded was inconsistent with the statutory Scheme. Accordingly, inclusion of redemption fine in an SVLDR-1 declaration does not by itself make the declarant ineligible; a rejected declaration must be treated as eligible and considered on merits in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
