Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 exclusions do not extend to cases involving confiscation or redemption fine. Redemption fine imposed in lieu of confiscation forms part of the amount recoverable under the applicable indirect tax law and cannot be separated from the duty demand for Scheme eligibility. A departmental communication treating redemption fine as excluded was inconsistent with the statutory Scheme. Accordingly, inclusion of redemption fine in an SVLDR-1 declaration does not by itself make the declarant ineligible; a rejected declaration must be treated as eligible and considered on merits in accordance with law.
The Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 exclusions do not extend to cases involving confiscation or redemption fine. Redemption fine imposed in lieu of confiscation forms part of the amount recoverable under the applicable indirect tax law and cannot be separated from the duty demand for Scheme eligibility. A departmental communication treating redemption fine as excluded was inconsistent with the statutory Scheme. Accordingly, inclusion of redemption fine in an SVLDR-1 declaration does not by itself make the declarant ineligible; a rejected declaration must be treated as eligible and considered on merits in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
