Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Anticipatory bail in alleged fraudulent input tax credit matters is examined through the necessity of arrest and custodial interrogation. The notes state that arrest powers under the CGST Act require objectively founded reasons to believe and are investigative rather than punitive. They emphasise that the seriousness of an economic offence alone does not displace personal liberty, particularly where documentary, financial and electronic material has largely been secured and there is no indicated risk of absconding or evidence tampering. Pending tax adjudication does not prevent criminal investigation, but tax recovery concerns alone should not determine liberty. Bail may be conditioned on surrender, cooperation, travel restrictions and non-interference with evidence, while lawful future arrest remains available if valid grounds arise.
Anticipatory bail in alleged fraudulent input tax credit matters is examined through the necessity of arrest and custodial interrogation. The notes state that arrest powers under the CGST Act require objectively founded reasons to believe and are investigative rather than punitive. They emphasise that the seriousness of an economic offence alone does not displace personal liberty, particularly where documentary, financial and electronic material has largely been secured and there is no indicated risk of absconding or evidence tampering. Pending tax adjudication does not prevent criminal investigation, but tax recovery concerns alone should not determine liberty. Bail may be conditioned on surrender, cooperation, travel restrictions and non-interference with evidence, while lawful future arrest remains available if valid grounds arise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.