Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Composite supply treatment of inpatient healthcare is examined...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Composite supply treatment of inpatient healthcare is examined where medicines, consumables and room rent are supplied alongside exempt healthcare services. The petitioner's position is that healthcare is the principal supply and these elements are incidental, so the entire composite supply remains exempt, notwithstanding medicine billing at MRP without separately charging GST. The competing issue is whether separate MRP billing constitutes an independent taxable sale of medicines and permits a tax demand for tax collected but not paid. The text notes a conflict between these characterisations; affidavits were directed and coercive recovery was restrained pending further hearing.
Composite supply treatment of inpatient healthcare is examined where medicines, consumables and room rent are supplied alongside exempt healthcare services. The petitioner's position is that healthcare is the principal supply and these elements are incidental, so the entire composite supply remains exempt, notwithstanding medicine billing at MRP without separately charging GST. The competing issue is whether separate MRP billing constitutes an independent taxable sale of medicines and permits a tax demand for tax collected but not paid. The text notes a conflict between these characterisations; affidavits were directed and coercive recovery was restrained pending further hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.