Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Rectification jurisdiction is confined to correcting mistakes apparent from the record and is comparable to the limited review standard under the Civil Procedure Code. It does not permit the Tribunal to revisit a detailed merits order, reconsider factual aspects of reassessment, or re-appreciate the controversy merely because the earlier decision is alleged to be erroneous. Where a merits order is challenged as erroneous, the appropriate course is the statutory appellate remedy rather than recall through rectification. The text states that a recall exceeding this limited jurisdiction was set aside and the original appellate order restored.
Rectification jurisdiction is confined to correcting mistakes apparent from the record and is comparable to the limited review standard under the Civil Procedure Code. It does not permit the Tribunal to revisit a detailed merits order, reconsider factual aspects of reassessment, or re-appreciate the controversy merely because the earlier decision is alleged to be erroneous. Where a merits order is challenged as erroneous, the appropriate course is the statutory appellate remedy rather than recall through rectification. The text states that a recall exceeding this limited jurisdiction was set aside and the original appellate order restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
