Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification jurisdiction is confined to correcting mistakes apparent from the record and is comparable to the limited review standard under the Civil Procedure Code. It does not permit the Tribunal to revisit a detailed merits order, reconsider factual aspects of reassessment, or re-appreciate the controversy merely because the earlier decision is alleged to be erroneous. Where a merits order is challenged as erroneous, the appropriate course is the statutory appellate remedy rather than recall through rectification. The text states that a recall exceeding this limited jurisdiction was set aside and the original appellate order restored.
Rectification jurisdiction is confined to correcting mistakes apparent from the record and is comparable to the limited review standard under the Civil Procedure Code. It does not permit the Tribunal to revisit a detailed merits order, reconsider factual aspects of reassessment, or re-appreciate the controversy merely because the earlier decision is alleged to be erroneous. Where a merits order is challenged as erroneous, the appropriate course is the statutory appellate remedy rather than recall through rectification. The text states that a recall exceeding this limited jurisdiction was set aside and the original appellate order restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
