Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insurance compensation for fire damage to stock and business interiors should not be separately added to business income where it has already been adjusted against the loss and only the net loss is debited in the profit and loss account; a further addition would duplicate taxation while ignoring the corresponding loss. The discussion distinguishes such compensation from compensation for loss of a capital asset and therefore from capital-gains treatment. It also states that an appellate authority should not sustain an addition on a wholly different basis without addressing the assessment's original foundation. Deletion of the related quantum addition removes the basis for a concealment penalty.
Insurance compensation for fire damage to stock and business interiors should not be separately added to business income where it has already been adjusted against the loss and only the net loss is debited in the profit and loss account; a further addition would duplicate taxation while ignoring the corresponding loss. The discussion distinguishes such compensation from compensation for loss of a capital asset and therefore from capital-gains treatment. It also states that an appellate authority should not sustain an addition on a wholly different basis without addressing the assessment's original foundation. Deletion of the related quantum addition removes the basis for a concealment penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.