Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Floating seals are discussed as classifiable by their sole or principal use as machinery parts under tariff heading 8431 rather than as mechanical seals under heading 8484 where no admissible evidence establishes use in other machinery or equipment. The notes state that supplier invoices disclosed the imported goods to Customs and that the dispute concerned classification; on that basis, invocation of the extended limitation period was not sustainable. The resulting demand, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were consequently set aside, with the appeal allowed and consequential relief granted.
Floating seals are discussed as classifiable by their sole or principal use as machinery parts under tariff heading 8431 rather than as mechanical seals under heading 8484 where no admissible evidence establishes use in other machinery or equipment. The notes state that supplier invoices disclosed the imported goods to Customs and that the dispute concerned classification; on that basis, invocation of the extended limitation period was not sustainable. The resulting demand, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were consequently set aside, with the appeal allowed and consequential relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
