Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
401 to 420 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 172 assessment procedures are examined where a shipping assessee elected annual assessment of total income under Section 172(7), while separate vessel-wise assessments were also made under Section 172(4). The notes identify the contention that, after exercising the annual-assessment option, separate assessments for individual vessels should not proceed. They also record that a return processed under Section 143(1), resulting in a refund, had become final. The High Court found the issues arguable and granted interim protection by staying recovery under the Section 172(4) assessments pending final disposal of the writ petition.
Section 172 assessment procedures are examined where a shipping assessee elected annual assessment of total income under Section 172(7), while separate vessel-wise assessments were also made under Section 172(4). The notes identify the contention that, after exercising the annual-assessment option, separate assessments for individual vessels should not proceed. They also record that a return processed under Section 143(1), resulting in a refund, had become final. The High Court found the issues arguable and granted interim protection by staying recovery under the Section 172(4) assessments pending final disposal of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.