Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Transfer-pricing adjustments for the project business segment required fresh consideration in line with the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions, without adjudication of their merits. The ITAT restored this issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer for a lawful fresh determination after hearing the assessee. The arm's length price of intra-group services was also remanded because the Transfer Pricing Officer had accepted that price in a subsequent assessment year; the merits were not decided. The Transfer Pricing Officer must reconsider the issue after providing an opportunity of hearing. The appeals for the relevant assessment years were allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer-pricing adjustments for the project business segment required fresh consideration in line with the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions, without adjudication of their merits. The ITAT restored this issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer for a lawful fresh determination after hearing the assessee. The arm's length price of intra-group services was also remanded because the Transfer Pricing Officer had accepted that price in a subsequent assessment year; the merits were not decided. The Transfer Pricing Officer must reconsider the issue after providing an opportunity of hearing. The appeals for the relevant assessment years were allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.