Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Transfer-pricing adjustments for the project business segment required fresh consideration in line with the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions, without adjudication of their merits. The ITAT restored this issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer for a lawful fresh determination after hearing the assessee. The arm's length price of intra-group services was also remanded because the Transfer Pricing Officer had accepted that price in a subsequent assessment year; the merits were not decided. The Transfer Pricing Officer must reconsider the issue after providing an opportunity of hearing. The appeals for the relevant assessment years were allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer-pricing adjustments for the project business segment required fresh consideration in line with the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions, without adjudication of their merits. The ITAT restored this issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer for a lawful fresh determination after hearing the assessee. The arm's length price of intra-group services was also remanded because the Transfer Pricing Officer had accepted that price in a subsequent assessment year; the merits were not decided. The Transfer Pricing Officer must reconsider the issue after providing an opportunity of hearing. The appeals for the relevant assessment years were allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.