Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Restoration proceedings are confined to examining whether a genuine cause existed for a party's non-appearance when an appeal was dismissed in default. Once the dismissal is recalled, the appeal returns to the stage at which it was dismissed and must be heard afresh. The discussion states that restoration gives the absent party an opportunity to address admission and maintainability, without deciding whether the statutory remedy lies by appeal or revision. Questions concerning the treatment of foreign currency and the proper remedy must be determined in the restored proceeding after hearing both sides, through a speaking order. Deciding maintainability during restoration would improperly review and replace the earlier dismissal order.
Restoration proceedings are confined to examining whether a genuine cause existed for a party's non-appearance when an appeal was dismissed in default. Once the dismissal is recalled, the appeal returns to the stage at which it was dismissed and must be heard afresh. The discussion states that restoration gives the absent party an opportunity to address admission and maintainability, without deciding whether the statutory remedy lies by appeal or revision. Questions concerning the treatment of foreign currency and the proper remedy must be determined in the restored proceeding after hearing both sides, through a speaking order. Deciding maintainability during restoration would improperly review and replace the earlier dismissal order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
