Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
High-seas sale treatment requires proof that title passed before goods crossed the customs frontier; invoices raised after entry into India, a Tamil Nadu factory address, and customs duty paid by the dealer did not establish such sales. The imported-car transactions were therefore taxable under the TNGST Act. The G.O.Ms.No.381 exemption required goods purchased against declaration to be used for the stated manufacturing purpose. Failure to correlate purchases with exports or prove declared use triggered tax liability, and compounding fees could not replace that consequence. The Tribunal could correct the appellate misapplication of the exemption despite no departmental appeal.
High-seas sale treatment requires proof that title passed before goods crossed the customs frontier; invoices raised after entry into India, a Tamil Nadu factory address, and customs duty paid by the dealer did not establish such sales. The imported-car transactions were therefore taxable under the TNGST Act. The G.O.Ms.No.381 exemption required goods purchased against declaration to be used for the stated manufacturing purpose. Failure to correlate purchases with exports or prove declared use triggered tax liability, and compounding fees could not replace that consequence. The Tribunal could correct the appellate misapplication of the exemption despite no departmental appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.