Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
High-seas sale treatment requires proof that title passed before goods crossed the customs frontier; invoices raised after entry into India, a Tamil Nadu factory address, and customs duty paid by the dealer did not establish such sales. The imported-car transactions were therefore taxable under the TNGST Act. The G.O.Ms.No.381 exemption required goods purchased against declaration to be used for the stated manufacturing purpose. Failure to correlate purchases with exports or prove declared use triggered tax liability, and compounding fees could not replace that consequence. The Tribunal could correct the appellate misapplication of the exemption despite no departmental appeal.
High-seas sale treatment requires proof that title passed before goods crossed the customs frontier; invoices raised after entry into India, a Tamil Nadu factory address, and customs duty paid by the dealer did not establish such sales. The imported-car transactions were therefore taxable under the TNGST Act. The G.O.Ms.No.381 exemption required goods purchased against declaration to be used for the stated manufacturing purpose. Failure to correlate purchases with exports or prove declared use triggered tax liability, and compounding fees could not replace that consequence. The Tribunal could correct the appellate misapplication of the exemption despite no departmental appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.