Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
High-seas sale treatment requires proof that title passed before goods crossed the customs frontier; invoices raised after entry into India, a Tamil Nadu factory address, and customs duty paid by the dealer did not establish such sales. The imported-car transactions were therefore taxable under the TNGST Act. The G.O.Ms.No.381 exemption required goods purchased against declaration to be used for the stated manufacturing purpose. Failure to correlate purchases with exports or prove declared use triggered tax liability, and compounding fees could not replace that consequence. The Tribunal could correct the appellate misapplication of the exemption despite no departmental appeal.
High-seas sale treatment requires proof that title passed before goods crossed the customs frontier; invoices raised after entry into India, a Tamil Nadu factory address, and customs duty paid by the dealer did not establish such sales. The imported-car transactions were therefore taxable under the TNGST Act. The G.O.Ms.No.381 exemption required goods purchased against declaration to be used for the stated manufacturing purpose. Failure to correlate purchases with exports or prove declared use triggered tax liability, and compounding fees could not replace that consequence. The Tribunal could correct the appellate misapplication of the exemption despite no departmental appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.