Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3061 to 3080 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
High-seas sale treatment requires proof that title passed before goods crossed the customs frontier; invoices raised after entry into India, a Tamil Nadu factory address, and customs duty paid by the dealer did not establish such sales. The imported-car transactions were therefore taxable under the TNGST Act. The G.O.Ms.No.381 exemption required goods purchased against declaration to be used for the stated manufacturing purpose. Failure to correlate purchases with exports or prove declared use triggered tax liability, and compounding fees could not replace that consequence. The Tribunal could correct the appellate misapplication of the exemption despite no departmental appeal.
High-seas sale treatment requires proof that title passed before goods crossed the customs frontier; invoices raised after entry into India, a Tamil Nadu factory address, and customs duty paid by the dealer did not establish such sales. The imported-car transactions were therefore taxable under the TNGST Act. The G.O.Ms.No.381 exemption required goods purchased against declaration to be used for the stated manufacturing purpose. Failure to correlate purchases with exports or prove declared use triggered tax liability, and compounding fees could not replace that consequence. The Tribunal could correct the appellate misapplication of the exemption despite no departmental appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
