Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Multiple show cause notices for alleged wrongful input tax credit cannot duplicate tax demands arising from the same supplier transactions. The High Court treated the later notice and consequential order as unsustainable to the extent they covered seven suppliers already included in an earlier proceeding, and quashed the duplicated portion. Proceedings concerning two additional suppliers were preserved, with the taxpayer retaining the statutory appeal remedy against that part of the later order. The material therefore distinguishes impermissible duplication of liability from separate allegations involving suppliers not covered by the original notice.
Multiple show cause notices for alleged wrongful input tax credit cannot duplicate tax demands arising from the same supplier transactions. The High Court treated the later notice and consequential order as unsustainable to the extent they covered seven suppliers already included in an earlier proceeding, and quashed the duplicated portion. Proceedings concerning two additional suppliers were preserved, with the taxpayer retaining the statutory appeal remedy against that part of the later order. The material therefore distinguishes impermissible duplication of liability from separate allegations involving suppliers not covered by the original notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
