Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Judicial review of customs show-cause notices may be invoked...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental adjudication.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Judicial review of customs show-cause notices may be invoked where jurisdictional facts are absent, including where a notice relies on undisclosed or inconclusive overseas enquiry material. The discussion distinguishes that situation from notices supported by identifiable discrepancies in certificates of origin. A certificate not issued by the stated authority, or an unreconciled mismatch between the certificate's invoice number and the importer's invoice, can provide a factual basis for customs proceedings. Referral of a certificate for further investigation does not itself cure an apparent discrepancy. The importer's explanation is to be examined by the competent customs authority during adjudication.
Judicial review of customs show-cause notices may be invoked where jurisdictional facts are absent, including where a notice relies on undisclosed or inconclusive overseas enquiry material. The discussion distinguishes that situation from notices supported by identifiable discrepancies in certificates of origin. A certificate not issued by the stated authority, or an unreconciled mismatch between the certificate's invoice number and the importer's invoice, can provide a factual basis for customs proceedings. Referral of a certificate for further investigation does not itself cure an apparent discrepancy. The importer's explanation is to be examined by the competent customs authority during adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
