Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
For GST anti-profiteering in an ongoing real-estate project, completion is reckoned from actual issuance of the Occupancy Certificate, not from filing the application. The discussion states that post-GST input tax credit benefits may be quantified by comparing pre- and post-GST ITC-to-purchase-value ratios using certified actual data, and apportioned to purchasers. Where homebuyers are identifiable from supplier records, the profiteered amount must be returned to them with interest; deposit in Consumer Welfare Funds is residual where recipients cannot genuinely be identified. It also notes that a penalty provision introduced after the investigation period cannot apply retrospectively without express statutory authority.
For GST anti-profiteering in an ongoing real-estate project, completion is reckoned from actual issuance of the Occupancy Certificate, not from filing the application. The discussion states that post-GST input tax credit benefits may be quantified by comparing pre- and post-GST ITC-to-purchase-value ratios using certified actual data, and apportioned to purchasers. Where homebuyers are identifiable from supplier records, the profiteered amount must be returned to them with interest; deposit in Consumer Welfare Funds is residual where recipients cannot genuinely be identified. It also notes that a penalty provision introduced after the investigation period cannot apply retrospectively without express statutory authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
