Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For GST anti-profiteering in an ongoing real-estate project, completion is reckoned from actual issuance of the Occupancy Certificate, not from filing the application. The discussion states that post-GST input tax credit benefits may be quantified by comparing pre- and post-GST ITC-to-purchase-value ratios using certified actual data, and apportioned to purchasers. Where homebuyers are identifiable from supplier records, the profiteered amount must be returned to them with interest; deposit in Consumer Welfare Funds is residual where recipients cannot genuinely be identified. It also notes that a penalty provision introduced after the investigation period cannot apply retrospectively without express statutory authority.
For GST anti-profiteering in an ongoing real-estate project, completion is reckoned from actual issuance of the Occupancy Certificate, not from filing the application. The discussion states that post-GST input tax credit benefits may be quantified by comparing pre- and post-GST ITC-to-purchase-value ratios using certified actual data, and apportioned to purchasers. Where homebuyers are identifiable from supplier records, the profiteered amount must be returned to them with interest; deposit in Consumer Welfare Funds is residual where recipients cannot genuinely be identified. It also notes that a penalty provision introduced after the investigation period cannot apply retrospectively without express statutory authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.