Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Minimum Alternate Tax under section 115JB does not apply to a statutory body constituted under a Central enactment that is not incorporated under the Companies Act, despite being assessable as a company under the Income-tax Act. Applying the principle that the legal fiction in section 115JB cannot extend to such entities, the High Court found the provision inapplicable. Consequently, the issue of disallowance under section 14A in computing book profit did not survive, as it depended on section 115JB applying. No substantial question of law arose, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Minimum Alternate Tax under section 115JB does not apply to a statutory body constituted under a Central enactment that is not incorporated under the Companies Act, despite being assessable as a company under the Income-tax Act. Applying the principle that the legal fiction in section 115JB cannot extend to such entities, the High Court found the provision inapplicable. Consequently, the issue of disallowance under section 14A in computing book profit did not survive, as it depended on section 115JB applying. No substantial question of law arose, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.