Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Surplus interest-free funds support a presumption that investments were funded from those sources, where such funds exceed the investments. On that basis, interest expenditure could not be disallowed or capitalised as capital work in progress when the building had already been put to use in earlier years. The text also states that a disallowance computed under section 14A read with rule 8D cannot, merely for that reason, be added to book profit under section 115JB. It records that the appellate deletions were upheld, as the issues were covered by binding decisions and concurrent factual findings, with no substantial question of law arising.
Surplus interest-free funds support a presumption that investments were funded from those sources, where such funds exceed the investments. On that basis, interest expenditure could not be disallowed or capitalised as capital work in progress when the building had already been put to use in earlier years. The text also states that a disallowance computed under section 14A read with rule 8D cannot, merely for that reason, be added to book profit under section 115JB. It records that the appellate deletions were upheld, as the issues were covered by binding decisions and concurrent factual findings, with no substantial question of law arising.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.