Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Primary purchase evidence, accepted sales and unrejected books may discharge the purchaser's burden unless the Revenue produces independent material showing sham supplies or return of consideration. A supplier's failure to substantiate its own procurement chain, alleged excess mining, or direct dispatch to customers does not alone justify disallowance. Where purchase evidence is deficient but sales, audited accounts and quantitative records are accepted, only the profit embedded in unverifiable purchases may be estimated, using the disclosed gross-profit ratio; complete disallowance would create artificial profits. A closing-stock balance in seized electronic records requires corroboration and cannot stand where incomplete consumption entries create a notional, improbable stock figure unsupported by physical stock or other defects.
Primary purchase evidence, accepted sales and unrejected books may discharge the purchaser's burden unless the Revenue produces independent material showing sham supplies or return of consideration. A supplier's failure to substantiate its own procurement chain, alleged excess mining, or direct dispatch to customers does not alone justify disallowance. Where purchase evidence is deficient but sales, audited accounts and quantitative records are accepted, only the profit embedded in unverifiable purchases may be estimated, using the disclosed gross-profit ratio; complete disallowance would create artificial profits. A closing-stock balance in seized electronic records requires corroboration and cannot stand where incomplete consumption entries create a notional, improbable stock figure unsupported by physical stock or other defects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.