Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1401 to 1420 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cash repayment of a family loan between spouses did not justify penalty under section 271E where the loan was fully explained, used for the benefit of the family, and gave rise to no addition. The Tribunal treated both the husband-wife loan transaction and the partial repayment to the wife as family-benefit transactions, following a co-ordinate Bench decision. It held that these circumstances established reasonable cause and made the penalty unsustainable. The penalty was therefore deleted and the appeal was allowed.
Cash repayment of a family loan between spouses did not justify penalty under section 271E where the loan was fully explained, used for the benefit of the family, and gave rise to no addition. The Tribunal treated both the husband-wife loan transaction and the partial repayment to the wife as family-benefit transactions, following a co-ordinate Bench decision. It held that these circumstances established reasonable cause and made the penalty unsustainable. The penalty was therefore deleted and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
