Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Availability of an efficacious statutory GST appeal ordinarily limits writ jurisdiction, except where fundamental rights, natural justice, jurisdictional error or vires are genuinely implicated. A noticee that participated, filed replies and documents, and received personal hearings cannot claim that natural justice required the adjudicating authority to seek further material. Allegations that replies or evidence were inadequately considered, and challenges to the sufficiency of material or adjudicatory conclusions, concern merits for the appellate mechanism. The writ petition was dismissed because no recognised exception to exhausting the statutory remedy was established, while writ-pendency time was excluded for considering appeal limitation, subject to independent appellate determination.
Availability of an efficacious statutory GST appeal ordinarily limits writ jurisdiction, except where fundamental rights, natural justice, jurisdictional error or vires are genuinely implicated. A noticee that participated, filed replies and documents, and received personal hearings cannot claim that natural justice required the adjudicating authority to seek further material. Allegations that replies or evidence were inadequately considered, and challenges to the sufficiency of material or adjudicatory conclusions, concern merits for the appellate mechanism. The writ petition was dismissed because no recognised exception to exhausting the statutory remedy was established, while writ-pendency time was excluded for considering appeal limitation, subject to independent appellate determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
