Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Availability of an efficacious statutory GST appeal ordinarily limits writ jurisdiction, except where fundamental rights, natural justice, jurisdictional error or vires are genuinely implicated. A noticee that participated, filed replies and documents, and received personal hearings cannot claim that natural justice required the adjudicating authority to seek further material. Allegations that replies or evidence were inadequately considered, and challenges to the sufficiency of material or adjudicatory conclusions, concern merits for the appellate mechanism. The writ petition was dismissed because no recognised exception to exhausting the statutory remedy was established, while writ-pendency time was excluded for considering appeal limitation, subject to independent appellate determination.
Availability of an efficacious statutory GST appeal ordinarily limits writ jurisdiction, except where fundamental rights, natural justice, jurisdictional error or vires are genuinely implicated. A noticee that participated, filed replies and documents, and received personal hearings cannot claim that natural justice required the adjudicating authority to seek further material. Allegations that replies or evidence were inadequately considered, and challenges to the sufficiency of material or adjudicatory conclusions, concern merits for the appellate mechanism. The writ petition was dismissed because no recognised exception to exhausting the statutory remedy was established, while writ-pendency time was excluded for considering appeal limitation, subject to independent appellate determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
