Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
A writ petition challenging a GST demand order without first using the statutory appellate remedy is not maintainable where an efficacious appeal is available under the CGST Act. The High Court directed the petitioner to pursue that remedy, while leaving all contentions open for the Appellate Authority. The petition was disposed of with liberty to file a statutory appeal, and the time spent pursuing the writ proceedings was to be excluded for limitation purposes if the appeal is filed within four weeks.
A writ petition challenging a GST demand order without first using the statutory appellate remedy is not maintainable where an efficacious appeal is available under the CGST Act. The High Court directed the petitioner to pursue that remedy, while leaving all contentions open for the Appellate Authority. The petition was disposed of with liberty to file a statutory appeal, and the time spent pursuing the writ proceedings was to be excluded for limitation purposes if the appeal is filed within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
