Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
A writ petition challenging a GST demand order without first using the statutory appellate remedy is not maintainable where an efficacious appeal is available under the CGST Act. The High Court directed the petitioner to pursue that remedy, while leaving all contentions open for the Appellate Authority. The petition was disposed of with liberty to file a statutory appeal, and the time spent pursuing the writ proceedings was to be excluded for limitation purposes if the appeal is filed within four weeks.
A writ petition challenging a GST demand order without first using the statutory appellate remedy is not maintainable where an efficacious appeal is available under the CGST Act. The High Court directed the petitioner to pursue that remedy, while leaving all contentions open for the Appellate Authority. The petition was disposed of with liberty to file a statutory appeal, and the time spent pursuing the writ proceedings was to be excluded for limitation purposes if the appeal is filed within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
