Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
A rent reasonableness certificate was invalid because the hiring...
Fair-rent assessment requires consideration of lease terms, valuation principles and prevailing market rent; the certificate was quashed for fresh review.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A rent reasonableness certificate was invalid because the hiring committee failed to consider the lease deed supplied by the petitioner and the applicable fair-rent assessment or reassessment material. The relevant norms required assessment through recognised valuation principles and prevailing market rent for private buildings leased by Central Government departments. Non-consideration of these relevant materials vitiated the certificate. The High Court quashed the certificate and directed the competent respondents to reconsider the request after considering the lease deed and applicable fair-rent assessment material within the stipulated period.
A rent reasonableness certificate was invalid because the hiring committee failed to consider the lease deed supplied by the petitioner and the applicable fair-rent assessment or reassessment material. The relevant norms required assessment through recognised valuation principles and prevailing market rent for private buildings leased by Central Government departments. Non-consideration of these relevant materials vitiated the certificate. The High Court quashed the certificate and directed the competent respondents to reconsider the request after considering the lease deed and applicable fair-rent assessment material within the stipulated period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
