Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A rent reasonableness certificate was invalid because the hiring...
Fair-rent assessment requires consideration of lease terms, valuation principles and prevailing market rent; the certificate was quashed for fresh review.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A rent reasonableness certificate was invalid because the hiring committee failed to consider the lease deed supplied by the petitioner and the applicable fair-rent assessment or reassessment material. The relevant norms required assessment through recognised valuation principles and prevailing market rent for private buildings leased by Central Government departments. Non-consideration of these relevant materials vitiated the certificate. The High Court quashed the certificate and directed the competent respondents to reconsider the request after considering the lease deed and applicable fair-rent assessment material within the stipulated period.
A rent reasonableness certificate was invalid because the hiring committee failed to consider the lease deed supplied by the petitioner and the applicable fair-rent assessment or reassessment material. The relevant norms required assessment through recognised valuation principles and prevailing market rent for private buildings leased by Central Government departments. Non-consideration of these relevant materials vitiated the certificate. The High Court quashed the certificate and directed the competent respondents to reconsider the request after considering the lease deed and applicable fair-rent assessment material within the stipulated period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.