Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Circular No. 19/2019 requires a Document Identification Number...
Document Identification Number compliance is satisfied when electronically communicated orders are promptly authenticated through a correctly identified subsequent DIN intimation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Circular No. 19/2019 requires a Document Identification Number (DIN) to ensure authenticity and an audit trail for departmental communications. Where manually prepared orders are uploaded for DIN generation, initially communicated electronically, and promptly followed by an intimation correctly stating the DIN assigned to the enclosed order, the procedure constitutes substantial compliance. The manual-communication exception requiring prior approval does not apply to such electronic communications. A typographical error entering the intimation letter's DIN instead of the order's DIN does not invalidate the order if the intimation correctly identifies the order and its DIN. The Tribunal's quashing of the DRP directions and revisional order was set aside, with remand for remaining issues.
Circular No. 19/2019 requires a Document Identification Number (DIN) to ensure authenticity and an audit trail for departmental communications. Where manually prepared orders are uploaded for DIN generation, initially communicated electronically, and promptly followed by an intimation correctly stating the DIN assigned to the enclosed order, the procedure constitutes substantial compliance. The manual-communication exception requiring prior approval does not apply to such electronic communications. A typographical error entering the intimation letter's DIN instead of the order's DIN does not invalidate the order if the intimation correctly identifies the order and its DIN. The Tribunal's quashing of the DRP directions and revisional order was set aside, with remand for remaining issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
