Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Sale advances supported by a seized agreement, receipt and subsequent conveyance were treated as explained sale consideration rather than unexplained money under section 69A. The notes state that any suppressed consideration would instead be considered under capital gains in the relevant assessment year, and the section 69A additions were vacated. For section 153C, the relevant date for exclusion is stated to be the search initiation date, not later receipt of seized material; the deeming provision is confined to identifying abated assessment years, so the jurisdictional challenge failed. The mechanical-approval challenge under section 153D also failed for lack of cogent supporting material. The consolidated satisfaction-note issue remained open.
Sale advances supported by a seized agreement, receipt and subsequent conveyance were treated as explained sale consideration rather than unexplained money under section 69A. The notes state that any suppressed consideration would instead be considered under capital gains in the relevant assessment year, and the section 69A additions were vacated. For section 153C, the relevant date for exclusion is stated to be the search initiation date, not later receipt of seized material; the deeming provision is confined to identifying abated assessment years, so the jurisdictional challenge failed. The mechanical-approval challenge under section 153D also failed for lack of cogent supporting material. The consolidated satisfaction-note issue remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
