Content ownership determines GST treatment of printed publications: customer-supplied text is a taxable printing service, owned content is exempt good...
Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Non-declaration of dutiable gold articles is examined through the Customs Declaration Form, contemporaneous documentary evidence and the absence of independent material supporting an alternative account. The text addresses the evidentiary effect of unavailable airport CCTV footage where it was automatically erased before preservation was sought. It also considers the reliability of a retracted statement recorded under the Customs Act, particularly where signed disclosures, a Panchnama and the lack of contemporaneous proof of coercion provide corroboration. Judicial review under Article 226 is described as limited to perversity, no evidence or manifest illegality, rather than reappreciation of plausible factual findings.
Non-declaration of dutiable gold articles is examined through the Customs Declaration Form, contemporaneous documentary evidence and the absence of independent material supporting an alternative account. The text addresses the evidentiary effect of unavailable airport CCTV footage where it was automatically erased before preservation was sought. It also considers the reliability of a retracted statement recorded under the Customs Act, particularly where signed disclosures, a Panchnama and the lack of contemporaneous proof of coercion provide corroboration. Judicial review under Article 226 is described as limited to perversity, no evidence or manifest illegality, rather than reappreciation of plausible factual findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.