Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Non-declaration of dutiable gold articles is examined through the Customs Declaration Form, contemporaneous documentary evidence and the absence of independent material supporting an alternative account. The text addresses the evidentiary effect of unavailable airport CCTV footage where it was automatically erased before preservation was sought. It also considers the reliability of a retracted statement recorded under the Customs Act, particularly where signed disclosures, a Panchnama and the lack of contemporaneous proof of coercion provide corroboration. Judicial review under Article 226 is described as limited to perversity, no evidence or manifest illegality, rather than reappreciation of plausible factual findings.
Non-declaration of dutiable gold articles is examined through the Customs Declaration Form, contemporaneous documentary evidence and the absence of independent material supporting an alternative account. The text addresses the evidentiary effect of unavailable airport CCTV footage where it was automatically erased before preservation was sought. It also considers the reliability of a retracted statement recorded under the Customs Act, particularly where signed disclosures, a Panchnama and the lack of contemporaneous proof of coercion provide corroboration. Judicial review under Article 226 is described as limited to perversity, no evidence or manifest illegality, rather than reappreciation of plausible factual findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.