Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Knowing assistance in handling proceeds of crime falls within money-laundering where a person knowingly participates in processes connected with concealment, possession, acquisition, use or projection of tainted property as untainted. The material described alleged that funds from a scheduled offence were routed through the petitioner and substantially retransferred to personal accounts rather than used for the stated construction purpose, indicating prima facie active participation in transferring, concealing and disbursing such funds. The complaint was therefore not quashed. Parity with a bank Branch Manager was unavailable because the earlier quashing rested on no specific material against that manager, whereas the petitioner was attributed specific acts involving tainted funds.
Knowing assistance in handling proceeds of crime falls within money-laundering where a person knowingly participates in processes connected with concealment, possession, acquisition, use or projection of tainted property as untainted. The material described alleged that funds from a scheduled offence were routed through the petitioner and substantially retransferred to personal accounts rather than used for the stated construction purpose, indicating prima facie active participation in transferring, concealing and disbursing such funds. The complaint was therefore not quashed. Parity with a bank Branch Manager was unavailable because the earlier quashing rested on no specific material against that manager, whereas the petitioner was attributed specific acts involving tainted funds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
