Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Knowing assistance in handling proceeds of crime falls within money-laundering where a person knowingly participates in processes connected with concealment, possession, acquisition, use or projection of tainted property as untainted. The material described alleged that funds from a scheduled offence were routed through the petitioner and substantially retransferred to personal accounts rather than used for the stated construction purpose, indicating prima facie active participation in transferring, concealing and disbursing such funds. The complaint was therefore not quashed. Parity with a bank Branch Manager was unavailable because the earlier quashing rested on no specific material against that manager, whereas the petitioner was attributed specific acts involving tainted funds.
Knowing assistance in handling proceeds of crime falls within money-laundering where a person knowingly participates in processes connected with concealment, possession, acquisition, use or projection of tainted property as untainted. The material described alleged that funds from a scheduled offence were routed through the petitioner and substantially retransferred to personal accounts rather than used for the stated construction purpose, indicating prima facie active participation in transferring, concealing and disbursing such funds. The complaint was therefore not quashed. Parity with a bank Branch Manager was unavailable because the earlier quashing rested on no specific material against that manager, whereas the petitioner was attributed specific acts involving tainted funds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
