Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Page of 4785
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 95683 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A consequential GST refund rejection following an appellate order may be challenged through the statutory appeal where the appellate order merely set aside the earlier rejection on previously considered grounds. The Proper Officer may examine refund entitlement afresh on other legally permissible grounds, provided the fresh reasons are distinct from those rejected in appeal. Questions concerning the appellate order's effect and the validity of the new rejection grounds require merits review in the statutory appellate process. Writ intervention is unavailable where the order is not prima facie non est or wholly without jurisdiction. The taxpayer may seek exclusion of the time spent in writ proceedings for limitation purposes.
A consequential GST refund rejection following an appellate order may be challenged through the statutory appeal where the appellate order merely set aside the earlier rejection on previously considered grounds. The Proper Officer may examine refund entitlement afresh on other legally permissible grounds, provided the fresh reasons are distinct from those rejected in appeal. Questions concerning the appellate order's effect and the validity of the new rejection grounds require merits review in the statutory appellate process. Writ intervention is unavailable where the order is not prima facie non est or wholly without jurisdiction. The taxpayer may seek exclusion of the time spent in writ proceedings for limitation purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4785
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
