Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Duplicative GST proceedings on the same issues and assessment period cannot be sustained where central GST authorities have already issued an adjudication order that remains pending in appeal. The High Court found that the subsequent State GST assessment and rectification orders addressed matters already decided in the earlier central GST order. It therefore quashed the State GST orders and allowed the writ petition, preventing parallel adjudication of identical GST issues for the same period.
Duplicative GST proceedings on the same issues and assessment period cannot be sustained where central GST authorities have already issued an adjudication order that remains pending in appeal. The High Court found that the subsequent State GST assessment and rectification orders addressed matters already decided in the earlier central GST order. It therefore quashed the State GST orders and allowed the writ petition, preventing parallel adjudication of identical GST issues for the same period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.