Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96207 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Re-transportation of purchased machinery to the seller for testing without consideration is not a supply under section 7(1)(a) of the CGST/KGST Act and does not attract tax on the movement. Rule 55 permits such movement otherwise than by way of supply under delivery challans, but Rule 138 still requires an e-way bill unless an exemption applies. Transport without the required e-way bill attracts penalty under the second part of section 129(1)(a). The High Court upheld the reduced penalty and consequential refund ordered by the Single Judge, while dismissing the writ appeal.
Re-transportation of purchased machinery to the seller for testing without consideration is not a supply under section 7(1)(a) of the CGST/KGST Act and does not attract tax on the movement. Rule 55 permits such movement otherwise than by way of supply under delivery challans, but Rule 138 still requires an e-way bill unless an exemption applies. Transport without the required e-way bill attracts penalty under the second part of section 129(1)(a). The High Court upheld the reduced penalty and consequential refund ordered by the Single Judge, while dismissing the writ appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
