Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
A bank stock statement cannot alone establish undervaluation of closing stock for tax purposes without independently verified evidence. Where the taxpayer consistently applied its valuation method, reconciled differences from bank figures, and the books showed no defects, deletion of the addition was upheld. Applying the principle of consistency, deletion of interest disallowance on unpaid purchase price was sustained because no distinguishing facts or evidence of related-party payment or unreasonable interest emerged. Deletion of Keyman Insurance Policy premium disallowance was also upheld, as the company was the policy beneficiary and earlier-year treatment was followed. The tax appeal was dismissed for absence of a substantial question of law.
A bank stock statement cannot alone establish undervaluation of closing stock for tax purposes without independently verified evidence. Where the taxpayer consistently applied its valuation method, reconciled differences from bank figures, and the books showed no defects, deletion of the addition was upheld. Applying the principle of consistency, deletion of interest disallowance on unpaid purchase price was sustained because no distinguishing facts or evidence of related-party payment or unreasonable interest emerged. Deletion of Keyman Insurance Policy premium disallowance was also upheld, as the company was the policy beneficiary and earlier-year treatment was followed. The tax appeal was dismissed for absence of a substantial question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
