Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2021 to 2040 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 271C was noted as having been interpreted by the SC as inapplicable where tax deducted at source was deducted and remitted belatedly, supporting a prima facie challenge to penalty while leaving its final applicability for statutory appeals. The discussion states that circulars and office memoranda on stay of demand are guidelines, not statutory constraints on discretion under Section 220(6). Recovery of penalty was conditionally stayed pending appeal and for a further limited period, with expedited appellate disposal directed.
Section 271C was noted as having been interpreted by the SC as inapplicable where tax deducted at source was deducted and remitted belatedly, supporting a prima facie challenge to penalty while leaving its final applicability for statutory appeals. The discussion states that circulars and office memoranda on stay of demand are guidelines, not statutory constraints on discretion under Section 220(6). Recovery of penalty was conditionally stayed pending appeal and for a further limited period, with expedited appellate disposal directed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
