Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are...
Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protection.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are required for exclusion from penalty for under-reported interest income. The note states that an explanation based on revision of tax-credit information fails where bank-reported gross interest remained unchanged and the original return disclosed less interest than the original statement. It therefore records that the under-reporting penalty was sustained. It also explains that the prescribed period for filing the immunity application in Form No. 68 is mandatory: an application filed after the penalty order cannot survive. The rejection of post-penalty immunity was accordingly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are required for exclusion from penalty for under-reported interest income. The note states that an explanation based on revision of tax-credit information fails where bank-reported gross interest remained unchanged and the original return disclosed less interest than the original statement. It therefore records that the under-reporting penalty was sustained. It also explains that the prescribed period for filing the immunity application in Form No. 68 is mandatory: an application filed after the penalty order cannot survive. The rejection of post-penalty immunity was accordingly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
