Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are...
Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protection.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are required for exclusion from penalty for under-reported interest income. The note states that an explanation based on revision of tax-credit information fails where bank-reported gross interest remained unchanged and the original return disclosed less interest than the original statement. It therefore records that the under-reporting penalty was sustained. It also explains that the prescribed period for filing the immunity application in Form No. 68 is mandatory: an application filed after the penalty order cannot survive. The rejection of post-penalty immunity was accordingly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are required for exclusion from penalty for under-reported interest income. The note states that an explanation based on revision of tax-credit information fails where bank-reported gross interest remained unchanged and the original return disclosed less interest than the original statement. It therefore records that the under-reporting penalty was sustained. It also explains that the prescribed period for filing the immunity application in Form No. 68 is mandatory: an application filed after the penalty order cannot survive. The rejection of post-penalty immunity was accordingly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
