Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are...
Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protection.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are required for exclusion from penalty for under-reported interest income. The note states that an explanation based on revision of tax-credit information fails where bank-reported gross interest remained unchanged and the original return disclosed less interest than the original statement. It therefore records that the under-reporting penalty was sustained. It also explains that the prescribed period for filing the immunity application in Form No. 68 is mandatory: an application filed after the penalty order cannot survive. The rejection of post-penalty immunity was accordingly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are required for exclusion from penalty for under-reported interest income. The note states that an explanation based on revision of tax-credit information fails where bank-reported gross interest remained unchanged and the original return disclosed less interest than the original statement. It therefore records that the under-reporting penalty was sustained. It also explains that the prescribed period for filing the immunity application in Form No. 68 is mandatory: an application filed after the penalty order cannot survive. The rejection of post-penalty immunity was accordingly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
