Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are...
Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protection.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are required for exclusion from penalty for under-reported interest income. The note states that an explanation based on revision of tax-credit information fails where bank-reported gross interest remained unchanged and the original return disclosed less interest than the original statement. It therefore records that the under-reporting penalty was sustained. It also explains that the prescribed period for filing the immunity application in Form No. 68 is mandatory: an application filed after the penalty order cannot survive. The rejection of post-penalty immunity was accordingly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Bona fide explanation and full disclosure of material facts are required for exclusion from penalty for under-reported interest income. The note states that an explanation based on revision of tax-credit information fails where bank-reported gross interest remained unchanged and the original return disclosed less interest than the original statement. It therefore records that the under-reporting penalty was sustained. It also explains that the prescribed period for filing the immunity application in Form No. 68 is mandatory: an application filed after the penalty order cannot survive. The rejection of post-penalty immunity was accordingly upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
