Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Duty drawback recovery under Rule 16, despite no express limitation period, must be initiated within a reasonable time based on the facts. The text states that delayed recovery may be sustainable where fraudulent availment or suppression is alleged, but non-production of proof of export-proceeds realisation alone does not establish either ground. Where recovery proceedings begin more than seven years after drawback payments and no explanation is given for the delay, the text treats the proceedings as time-barred. It also notes that the consequential demand and penalty were set aside.
Duty drawback recovery under Rule 16, despite no express limitation period, must be initiated within a reasonable time based on the facts. The text states that delayed recovery may be sustainable where fraudulent availment or suppression is alleged, but non-production of proof of export-proceeds realisation alone does not establish either ground. Where recovery proceedings begin more than seven years after drawback payments and no explanation is given for the delay, the text treats the proceedings as time-barred. It also notes that the consequential demand and penalty were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
